Main Ideas

  • Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) is the prevalent statistical method in biology, but it has significant limitations.
  • NHST fails to provide two critical aspects:
    • 1. the magnitude of the effect of interest, and
    • 2. the precision of that estimate.
  • Understanding biological importance relies on effect magnitude rather than statistical significance.
  • It is recommended that all biological research include effect size statistics and confidence intervals (CIs) to facilitate better data analysis.
  • Using effect sizes alongside CIs offers a more comprehensive understanding of data relationships compared to p-values.
  • Presenting effect sizes can help researchers contextualize their results and contribute to future meta-analyses.
  • The article discusses standardized effect size statistics (d statistics and r statistics) that can be applied across various study designs and are essential for meta-analysis.
  • The authors also acknowledge the importance of unstandardized effect sizes and offer solutions to common challenges in calculating effect sizes and CIs, including issues with covariates, estimation bias, non-normal data, and non-independence of data.
  • The paper serves as both a practical guide for beginners and a call to improve statistical practices within biological research.

Reference

Nakagawa, S., & Cuthill, I. C. (2007). Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biological Reviews, 82(4), 591–605. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2007.00027.x