A program to optimize
research activities
on the long term
Context
For over 25 years, Creascience’s biostatisticians have been collaborating with both young startups and established pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to train their scientific staff and assist them in setting up, analyzing and interpreting and reporting scientific studies. Building on this experience, we are proud to present a new mentoring program aimed at increasing the autonomy of research teams within biotechnology startups with regard to good statistical and scientific practices.
Scientific research is an essential and critical activity for any startup in the field of life sciences, regardless of its stage of development. What is more, the sustainability of startups in this field depends directly on the quality of this research, whether directly to ensure the validity of the results obtained or to convince potential investors. Finally, the outcome and ultimate success inevitably involve confronting regulatory authorities at one point or another.
All these aspects make the use of good scientific practices and the ability to convince external stakeholders of them essential. In this context, statistical methods – which go well beyond the analysis of experimental data – constitute essential tools, as demonstrated in particular by their omnipresence in the standards of institutions in the health field.
For example…
- USA : The FDA requires that nonclinical trials follow a formal, detailed experimental design that includes steps taken to reduce bias.
- UK : The MHRA produces a specific guide for medical devices in particular to supervise the statistical aspects of R&D.
- Europe: EMA produces specific guidance to support the management of missing data: from trial planning to data analysis
Program Objectives
Direct Knowledge Transfer
Long-Term Tooting
Bénéfices attendus
Reduce R&D Costs
Statistical tools allow us to build more efficient trials whose scale is directly in line with to the intended research objective.
Speed Up the Research Process
Rigorous interpretation of results limits the need for validation studies.
Boost Scientific Credibility
Investors and government agencies are sensitive to good experimental practices as they translate to robust and reproducible findings.
Target Audience
- Biotechnology Startups in the Medical Field (Therapy Area)
Reassuring investors
- Biotechs & Pharmas in Preclinical Stage
Respect regulatory constraints
- Life Sciences Research Centers
Optimize R&D
Program Implementation
Seminar/Workshop on Good Statistical Practices
First, we offer a 3-hour seminar presenting the different aspects of good scientific practices in relation to statistical methods. This seminar (see attached detailed program) presents examples of both good and bad practices, particularly in relation to regulatory obligations. We recommend that all scientific and managerial staff attend. Finally, participation in the seminar is a prerequisite to the mentoring program, but it can be offered as a standalone product.
Selection of Contact Persons
At the end of the workshop, the company that decides to invest in the mentoring program chooses the person(s) who will be responsible for implementing the program within the company. We usually recommend that two people be involved, one active in the research laboratories and the other also concerned with research and in a position of authority in order to facilitate the adoption of the standards that will be established. These people must each be able to free up the equivalent of 10 to 15 hours per month.
Determining Program Objectives
The action plan described in the following section serves as a basis for discussion. Ideally, all suggested points should be covered, but depending on the company’s priorities, the weaknesses identified at the end of the initial seminar, the budget and time available, it is possible to focus on certain aspects.
In order to determine the exact objectives, the mentor assigned to the startup meets with representatives of the management team as well as the chosen resource persons and ensures to establish a curriculum and schedule that is both realistic and in accordance with the needs expressed.
Fixing the Program Duration
The exact duration of the program depends primarily on the objectives set and the anticipated availability of the resource persons. In all cases, its minimum duration is 6 months and ideally one year. However, at the end of the first 6-month block, a re-evaluation of the entire process is proposed and the startup is asked for subsequent involvement on a quarterly basis only.
It is also possible to organize the program over a longer period, either to accommodate limited availability of resource persons or to integrate additional concepts and tools.
How the Program Works
Principle of Intervention
For each theme:
- Initial meeting – presentation of concepts
- Submission of an analysis grid to transpose the concepts to the reality of the company
- Resource persons establish a standard proposal
- Second meeting to discuss the proposal
- Adjustments if necessary and finalization of the standard
Mentor Involvement
The mentor is an experienced biostatistician. He shares his expertise in two ways:
- Regular meetings with the company’s resource people either in person or remotely
- Permanently accessible for specific questions (email, telephone)
In addition, we have planned a certain number of optional blocks/bricks that can be added at any time when the implementation process generates new services.
Basic Program Blocks
The ideal program covers all of the following elements, but depending on the needs, it can also focus on certain aspects :
1
Test Data Management & Presentation
- Structure the results of each experiment: adequate formatting, informative dictionary, identification of the nature of each measure
- Take advantage of descriptive statistics: error detection, anticipation of problems
- Ensure the overall integrity of the data: continuity of research
2
Planning Effective & Useful Tests
- Define the scope of each experiment: target population, number of measurements, primary outcomes, etc.
- Manage bias and variability: replicates vs. repetitions, operator, batch, day effects, etc.
- Determine and justify the size of the trials: statistical significance versus practical/biological significance
3
Preparation & Management of Laboratory Work
- Write a precise and complete protocol: robustness, transparency and reproducibility
- Manage the progress of experiments: identify anomalies, react to difficulties encountered
- Establish a qualitative assessment: transmit and enrich knowledge of the processes
4
Rigorous Presentation of Results
- Understand the structure of the experiment and perform a data analysis consistent with it
- Adequately interpret the results: p-value, power, equivalence, superiority, non-inferiority
- Write a comprehensive experimental report, a relevant summary, a quality scientific publication
Optional Satellite Blocks
Scientific Article Review
Planning & Interpretation of a Pilot Study
Seminar on the Integration of New standards
Quantification of Sources of Variation
The research activities of biotech startups often involve series of experiments involving similar processes: same raw material, operators, types of measurements. A precise knowledge of the variability induced by each of the elements is crucial both for its scientific and economic implications. Indeed, it allows to appropriately choose the optimal experimental structure and to justify decisions that could seem counterintuitive to an external stakeholder. In this block, we offer you the necessary support to plan and analyze a study aimed at quantifying the main sources of variability present in your studies. The analysis includes recommendations on how to conduct future trials with respect to these sources of variability.